July 25, 2019

M&A Due Diligence: Clients vs Advisers

By Suzy Bibko, EMEA Content Marketing Manager, Merrill Corporation

Due diligence compliance has always been an issue in M&A, but do corporates and private equity firms have different concerns than lawyers and bankers? The answer is yes…except when it comes the role of technology in the future.

The Differences are Clear
We polled 500+ professionals involved in M&A transactions across EMEA to find out, and the results were interesting. While client and adviser thinking was aligned in many areas, there were differences:

  • Advisers think the risk of a data breach in the due diligence process has decreased in the past five years, while clients think it has increased;
  • Clients feel GDPR compliance concerns have affected the progress of more transactions than do advisers;
  • Clients believe AI and machine learning will transform due diligence over the long term more than advisers.

The Future is Technology
Of course, these results can be interpreted in different ways. And the one thing that really stood out is the role of technology in the future for clients and advisers. Both groups of practitioners believe that AI, machine learning and data analytics could solve some of their biggest challenges in due diligence.

Moreover, according to results from our Merrill Insight webinar, The Future of Due Diligence, continued preparedness and more advanced technology were both the second-most cited reason for driving change in due diligence.

This all sounds like a positive step forward, but are M&A practitioners actually preparing for these changes and embracing technology for good in due diligence? It certainly seems so.

Our case studies found that firms are indeed ‘walking the walk’. Baker McKenzie says they are on a technological journey in terms of due diligence, using virtual data rooms to be more efficient and AI software for contract review, with the plan to more heavily rely on AI and other technologies for the more commoditised aspects of due diligence.

“Where there is the technology to review documents with a degree of accuracy we should absolutely be embracing that, with lawyers providing the more strategic input and supporting clients to make judgements on risk. We want to ensure that lawyer time can be used more effectively and efficiently for our clients.” Jannan Crozier, Partner, Baker McKenzie

And Janis Dzenis of Luminor, the third-largest bank and financial services provides in the Baltic region, agrees new technologies such as AI and data analytics can further enhance the due diligence process, potentially automating specific areas. “I see no reason why we couldn’t do partial automation of due diligence development via data analytics and visualisation. AI has the potential to provide scenario analysis such that professionals would ‘just’ have to make the final decision.”

Ready to Get Started?

Here are some other items you might be interested in:

Legal Advisor Insights: Guiding Clients Through a Market Boom

Datasite assembled a panel of legal experts to dissect current market conditions and what to expect in the months ahead for M&A and capital markets. Here are three takeaways from the discussion.

Inside the SPAC PIPE

The PIPE, or private investment in public equity, is a critical step in the transformation of a blank check vehicle into an operating public company. Though PIPE offerings are hardly new to the capital markets, the recent rise in special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) has brought these capital raises along for the ride.

Colleagues Meeting in Conference Room
Four Key Ingredients to a Successful Buy-Side Process

Much like a great recipe, a successful buy-side transaction is a skillful blend of key ingredients and execution. And the higher the quality of the ingredients, the better the end result. So, what are the critical elements you should focus on to achieve a positive outcome?

Colleagues Discussing Business in Conference Room